4 ms·
Most people would love for an organization like the FBI that possesses their reach and oversight to protect their values and authority, although particular mean
by the-printer 3y ago
Most people would love for an organization like the FBI that possesses their reach and oversight to protect their values and authority, although particular means may vary.
I’m coming to feel like there are too many ambiguities in regard to anti-State, surveillance, security, etc. sentiment.
A lot of the kind of talk like in this article boils down to disputes over power and its preservation.
I’m not familiar with the Register’s ideological bend, if they possess one at all, nor that of the author’s. Nonetheless it’s worth taking into consideration the liberty and agency that this article is seeking to defend in response to the state’s.
- twosdai 3y agoI hear you about people offloading the work of their values being protected by another organization. However I think that time has shown the following: - The values of organizations can change rapidly within a human lifetime. - It's possible that tomorrow you're actions in the past are seen as a problem for these organizations. What I mean practically by these two remarks is that it can't be relied on for any organization to have your best interests at heart "tomorrow". So I believe that it's in the best interest of the user to always be the first line of defense for their data and privacy. With regards to the register, not sure it matters what way they swing for political affiliation if the end result is that the individual has control.