4 ms·
I think if you were referring to AI in its 'current form' all along, then most people will probably agree with you, myself included. But 20 years from now? I pe
by lb4r 3y ago
I think if you were referring to AI in its 'current form' all along, then most people will probably agree with you, myself included. But 20 years from now? I personally think it would be arrogant to dismiss the potential dangers.
- endisneigh 3y agoif we are talking about regulating something now, we must talk about capabilities now. there's no point in talking about nonexistent technology. should we also regulate teleportation? it's been done in a lab. if AI actually is a threat, then it can be regulated. it's not a threat now, period. preemptively regulating something is silly and a waste of energy and political capital.
- lb4r 3y agoYou added the paragraph about regulation after I had written my comment to your initial post, so I was really only talking about what I initially quoted. The question about regulation is complex and something I personally have yet to make up my mind about.