and you'll need to wait to see how that will develop No. We won't. You're going to give the FBI's responsibilities and tools to a new agency? It'll be crysta

and you'll need to wait to see how that will develop No. We won't. You're going to give the FBI's responsibilities and tools to a new agency? It'll be crystal clear how it will develop the next day. DHS was formed in 2002. By 2003 what we in the public would later know as "extraordinary rendition" became commonplace. I think you guys are all being naive. Or maybe you guys really are just this innocent that you believe in the inability of newly formed agencies to act with capability and resolve. Which would be especially simple in a situation where we get rid of the facility for investigating wrongdoing among law enforcement agencies. Which is, (checks notes), Ah, the FBI. I'd be very careful following anyone telling us that the FBI is not enough. They've done it before, and we ended up with the Patriot Act. Then they told us the problem was not only the FBI, but CIA too! That landed us with a DHS and a FISA court that is illegal for us to even ask information on. Think long and hard guys, about who exactly are the true people behind all these calls for new, more comprehensive agencies. And what their ultimate goals might be. jaquesm is speaking reason here. There is no sane point to disbanding the FBI. They're doing their job. If they have made a mistake you don't like. File a complaint. You can even contact your congressperson. But disbanding them is not a reasonable option.