> i don’t think the parent comment deserved to be flagged, so I vouched for it. Since archive.org have now updated that the problem scraper is now evading coun

> i don’t think the parent comment deserved to be flagged, so I vouched for it. Since archive.org have now updated that the problem scraper is now evading countermeasures and bringing them down repeatedly, and has been identified as an "AI" company, it could end up being an existential risk: if companies start using archive.org as a large-scale commercial IP theft proxy, they will likely face even more legal challenges than they already do.