3 ms·
Deputizing payment processors to curb money laundering sounds good on paper. The issue is that the payment processors ban and deny processing for random, comput
by theturtletalks 3y ago
Deputizing payment processors to curb money laundering sounds good on paper. The issue is that the payment processors ban and deny processing for random, computer generated reasons. Their decision is unappealable even if you’re in the right and are selling perfectly legal items.
Normally, if the government suspects you of money laundering, they build a case and bring it to court. The burden of proof is on them to prove you’re laundering money or selling illegal goods. Here, they found a way to not only lessen their work load by deputizing private companies, but also affectively gave payment processors a moat and impunity to decide what people can and cannot sell everywhere.
Visa and MC are well within their rights to deny any person for any reason, but the government should have their own processing network. My gut is saying this will never happen since Visa/MC would lobby heavily against it. Even if one is created, expect it to be neutered.
- milsorgen 3y ago>the government should have their own processing network Not government per se but isn't this what FedNow is all about? https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/banking/fednow https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/banking/fednow
- kelnos 3y ago> Visa and MC are well within their rights to deny any person for any reason True, but as payment networks take on a more utility-like place in society (I'd argue they're already there), we shouldn't allow them to discriminate for arbitrary reasons.