On the one hand, yes, it's incorrect. On the other, claiming malicious intent is pretending the little flood fill is FAR more important than it really is. It's

On the one hand, yes, it's incorrect. On the other, claiming malicious intent is pretending the little flood fill is FAR more important than it really is. It's not the era of the crusades anymore, and realistically if this bothers anyone, the easiest solution is to just remove that flood fill from the official flag because a speck of red makes zero difference in recognizing a flag. We're not carrying them into war, and the Vatican sure as hell isn't funding any expeditions by the Doge of Venice to reclaim Jerusalem any time soon. It's like someone getting the font for "California Republic" on the California flag wrong: no one cares except the people who shouldn't.