5 ms·
You will find the second law of thermodynamics very disappointing.
by short_throw 3y ago
You will find the second law of thermodynamics very disappointing.
- uoaei 3y agoAssuming the system is exposed to open atmosphere, and knowing that free electrons have higher energy than bound electrons, it's not clear what you're trying to imply here. Especially since entropy increasing only applies to closed systems.
- jojobas 3y ago[flagged]
- uoaei 3y ago[flagged]
- syntaxing 3y agoNot OP, but I'm not sure what you're trying to imply...going from liquid to gas phase change is going from lower entropy to higher entropy. There is no laws of thermodynamics being broken. And for your note for closed system, control volumes are defined as the system you're looking at. There is no "scale" when it comes to it (whether your control volume is the Earth, universe, or your room). Laws of thermodynamics cannot be broken regardless of your control volume size (as long as you obey the continuous limit theorem).
- jojobas 3y agoEvaporative cooling doesn't lower the entropy (oh I'm so anxious!), and also doesn't work outside of very few regions. If you're suggesting running a humidifier and then generating electricity off the temperature difference I have a crazier suggestion - run your thermocouple between something in direct sunlight and the shade. Or an extreme example known as a solar cell.
- uoaei 3y ago> If you're suggesting running a humidifier and then generating electricity off the temperature difference That's not what I'm suggesting. I am merely pointing out the absurdity of arguing that entropy increasing globally means that cooling cannot occur locally. > an extreme example known as a solar cell If you think solar cells operate via temperature differential, I'm just going to go ahead and end this conversation before I say something ugly about people who don't know things trying really hard to look like they do know things.
- ithkuil 3y ago> If you think solar cells operate via temperature differential, I'm just going to go ahead and end this conversation Why don't you instead apply https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_charity and assume that perhaps the person you're replying to is saying something else like for example that since the sun is providing energy this is not a closed system (and then provided two distinct examples: sun/shade temperature differential and also photoelectric cells). Perhaps you're right and the person really said something dumb, but perhaps they didn't. By applying the principle of charity you'll not only avoid being unnecessarily rude towards people but also open avenues for better communication and possibly even learn something