5 ms·

What? There are people in this comment section doing exactly that.

• walterbell 3y ago
  For example?
  • Am4TIfIsER0ppos 3y ago
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36117704 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36117704 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36117435 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36117435 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36117805 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36117805 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36116663 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36116663 Then there are the people defending the steps to the cashless society because those steps happened to be on people they didn't like: canadian truckers and pornhub. I recall one explicit comment I can't find now so I am willing to believe I hallucinated it.
    • walterbell 3y ago
      Those are people arguing for cash-less society. > No one is arguing for a cash-only society. My statement was about the opposite, i.e. co-existence rather than exclusion :)
      • Am4TIfIsER0ppos 3y ago
        My bad. I completely misread your comment. I am sorry for that. Let me be the first to argue for it. Electronic money is horrible. It obscures how much you're really spending on things. It requires a middle man in every transaction skimming a bit off the top. One company runs all the debit payments here. Mastercard and Visa used to split the credit card market but I assume they colluded to monopolize on on MC here. The government has passed laws demanding business partake in the racket but nothing to require acceptance of cash. Cash not accepted for public transport. Laws stating a maximum value of a transaction that is permitted in cash but have never increased the limit while they've been inflating the value away.