4 ms·
> What percentage of the diagnostic radiologists won't bother to even review the AI output? If someone’s not going to do their job, why does AI matter at all?
by brookst 3y ago
> What percentage of the diagnostic radiologists won't bother to even review the AI output?
If someone’s not going to do their job, why does AI matter at all? Why wouldn’t they just use the same boilerplate text for everyone today?
- kurthr 3y agoBecause it's a lot easier to rationalize not doing your job when it is (or at least seems to be) being done OK. There's a lot of rationalizing of decisions, when you've spent your life saying you're the expert helping people. Also, a lot easier for management to hand out a LOT more work since it looks like it's being done right. It's like the lawyer using ChatGPT to file legal briefs... he'd feel bad and be obviously incompetent, if he didn't file anything at all, but didn't feel bad (or feel the need to check anything) once it "looked right".
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- theage 3y agoI don't mind if lawyerGPT is used to help my one-off case, time enough to get that right for human eyes. However, since I'm the final set of eyes judging my care I'll be asking to see a doctor who has never been assisted by AI and is in fact not a mind-atrophied cyborg. Who knows when this opinion will morph into harmspreading and wrongthink that gets you escorted to the schizo wing instead. AI might yet be paraded as safe and effective.