3 ms·
You have to be careful with Nature. The root journal is top quality, but there's some sort of ancillary pipeline within the "Nature" umbrella where articles lo
by Enginerrrd 3y ago
You have to be careful with Nature. The root journal is top quality, but there's some sort of ancillary pipeline within the "Nature" umbrella where articles look very superficially like a Nature article, but are NOT published in the root journal and are NOT held to the same standard at all. It can be a bit confusing.
I'm not sure if the cited article falls into that category or not, because I can't quite recall how it works, but I just know I have been burned by that one in the past when I submitted something to be reviewed and it turned out one really surprising result was garbage tier.
- CamperBob2 3y agoYeah, apparently I missed the mark when I predicted a horoscope column. It's phrenology that's the new hotness at Nature. Connectome, shemectome: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01495-y https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01495-y They are evidently running a cross-sectional, longitudinal, inter-dimensional study on how to hose a prestigious 150-year-old brand.