4 ms·
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068624/ "Review shows that Novamin has significantly less c
by drjasonharrison 3y ago
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7068624/
"Review shows that Novamin has significantly less clinical evidence to prove its effectiveness as a remineralization agent in treating both carious and non-carious lesion. Hence, better designed clinical trials should be carried out in the future before definitive recommendations can be made."
- gymbeaux 3y agoI've read a few research papers that say essentially the opposite. I think you can find a study that supports your side most of the time.
- crackedbassoon 3y agoThe linked article is a meta analysis.
- gymbeaux 3y agoI think we should be skeptical of such articles especially when they go against what probably most articles say about a topic/hypothesis. I don’t know enough about chemistry or dentistry to really say beyond that which side is the correct side