4 ms·
>the need for "new", when in most cases something vaguely similar to WinXP or OSX is fine for 90% of things When you say that being vaguely similar to WinXP or
by GenerWork 3y ago
>the need for "new", when in most cases something vaguely similar to WinXP or OSX is fine for 90% of things
When you say that being vaguely similar to WinXP or OSX is fine for 90% of programs, is that in terms of looks, journey path, or something else?
- hedora 3y agoI’d guess it is in terms of user experience, which is hard to achieve if you are optimizing for looks or journey path. The article mentions this in the Business > User section, saying (removing euphemism and double negatives) the prevailing wisdom is that you will probably be fired unless you actively worsen the product, and provide metrics to explain how you did it. I’d think that companies with customer bases that don’t actively hate them are less likely to have big layoff rounds, but I am not a UX expert.
- EdiX 3y agoAFAIC all of those have degraded.