3 ms·

I generally disagree with this; the sorts of changes you might make for coarse pointers will tend to help the users of coarse pointers too; my mild inclination

I generally disagree with this; the sorts of changes you might make for coarse pointers will tend to help the users of coarse pointers too; my mild inclination is to view any use of any interaction media feature as a nudge to reconsider aspects of your design. They’re really just too coarse to be particularly good, hints of how the user might interact with the document. You probably also want (not (any-pointer: fine)) instead of (not (pointer: fine)), as the spec notes suggest: https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-4/#mf-interaction https://www.w3.org/TR/mediaqueries-4/#mf-interaction. (These spec notes are fairly extensive, because these are delicate matters where it’s easy to make a mess of things.)

dorfsmay 3y ago
When I tried phones and tablets were positive for "any-pointer" (not good!). From my tests the most reliable way to check for a mouse/track point/track pad are (pointer: fine) and (not (hover: none). Personally, as a user, I don't like a menu that take the whole page when on a desktop, I find a top bar or a hamburger work much better, but those don't work with a small enough screen and without a pointer device (mobile devices), where a vertical menu with big buttons is more appropriate. But I'm not a UX specialist nor a designer, so this is what I suggest but obviously follow their specs.