> Clearly, it takes a tremendous amount of skill to solve such a hard problem with such a small amount of code. Wrong. It is extremely easy. The code isn't gol

> Clearly, it takes a tremendous amount of skill to solve such a hard problem with such a small amount of code. Wrong. It is extremely easy. The code isn't golfed. It is regular J code that could be written by anyone who's looked at J for more than 5 minutes. They've not even copied it right! I was confused for a second at what gt was, but it's just a mistake from copying >. The other paragraph is also nonsense. It's just in a different language. Don't hand it off to python (or whatever mainstream lang) programmers, hand it to array programmers and they'll do just fine. If I were to be provocative I'd say that the J is vastly easier to read write and understand than the equivalent in any other (non array) language.