Or maybe just doing what every CPU company does: keep improving? I mean there are many good reasons why RISC-V still hasn't busted out yet. It's just an ISA, t

Or maybe just doing what every CPU company does: keep improving? I mean there are many good reasons why RISC-V still hasn't busted out yet. It's just an ISA, that's it. The implementations are wildly different, which is not something devs what to deal with. Risc-v didn't even have a rev 1 debug spec until a few months ago i mean come on get it together (what about the embedded -march that has been in limbo for 5 years). They're catching up with arm, slowly, but arm has an entire ecosystem that people trust that risc-v don't have.