I think that the way you propose does preclude a fair trial as it biases the jury but we've already covered that and come to different conclusions. I agree tha

I think that the way you propose does preclude a fair trial as it biases the jury but we've already covered that and come to different conclusions. I agree that free speech has significant value and restrictions should only be put in place when required to uphold other rights. I'm sure you're not alone in your opinion that a jury is able to ignore what they've heard about a case in the media. However you do disagree with the current judicial system of most developed nations. That doesn't necessarily make you wrong. I think there is merit to the argument you're making, I just am not convinced that people can ignore information like that. https://juryanalyst.com/blog/the-power-of-media-coverage-how-it-shapes-jurors-perceptions-and-how-scientific-jury-analysis-can-help-mitigate-bias/ https://juryanalyst.com/blog/the-power-of-media-coverage-how... https://www.canlii.org/en/commentary/doc/2019CanLIIDocs2798#!fragment//BQCwhgziBcwMYgK4DsDWszIQewE4BUBTADwBdoByCgSgBpltTCIBFRQ3AT0otokLC4EbDtyp8BQkAGU8pAELcASgFEAMioBqAQQByAYRW1SYAEbRS2ONWpA https://www.canlii.org/en/commentary/doc/2019CanLIIDocs2798#...