5 ms·
That seems naive in the extreme.
by nullsense 3y ago
That seems naive in the extreme.
- TylerE 3y agoI mean, it's Stallman. Of course it is. Has anyone who was so wrong about so much ever achieved such celebrity, at least outside of Politics? It's amazing he didn't destroy the entire movement.
- rakoo 3y agoIt's naïve in our system where problems are not solved as a group, but as a sum of individuals. If you don't trust someone to do something on your computer, then you also probably don't trust them to do much more outside; how can they be a part of the community if they aren't to be trusted ? We have abandoned all community-building to the state, and the state decides collective rules even though the state cannot manage a group this size with the best intents, especially considering the political-economic system we're in; it must assume everyone is problematic by default, and everyone's interest is at odds with the state interest. Stallman talks about anarchy, a system that seems to have been in place there at the time; one of the central tenet of anarchism is conviviality and building a community together. Everyone who is part of the community is trusted. In this system, you don't need passwords.
- nullsense 3y agoEveryone pretty much is problematic.