(Happy for flaws in my logic to be pointed out, I haven't gone particularly in depth in thinking about edge cases here) How about instead of "ease of semi-auto

(Happy for flaws in my logic to be pointed out, I haven't gone particularly in depth in thinking about edge cases here) How about instead of "ease of semi-automatic weapon acquirement" (which could be read as critical of gun regulation), the wording was "comparison of semi-automatic guns" - which is clearly aimed at assisting gun users in assessing guns, and is the direct equivalent of the page at issue in intent and wording? The company in this article may be misguided or deliberately overreaching - but there is also the possibility they have a point. I think they do have an interesting point, though I also think it fails on the idea that these tools are necessarily used for ill. Gun owners would argue the same, I suspect.