You are correct that this is the exact same dynamic as "big tech" censorship. This topic pertains to the de jure government [0], which should make freedom of sp

You are correct that this is the exact same dynamic as "big tech" censorship. This topic pertains to the de jure government [0], which should make freedom of speech as codified in the first amendment more relevant. Your mistake is expecting consistency from a group that has devolved to seeing hypocrisy as a virtue. It's no longer about lofty ideas and the categorical imperative, but rather fake bravado strong men pushing half-baked agendas to demonstrate naked power. [0] (being a libertarian I believe there is a strong argument that the tech monopolies constitute de facto government. but that isn't even relevant here)