3 ms·
Citing yourself > First, they are only concerned about thermal changes and it is well know now that RF-EMFs have non-thermal effects on biology(1). > Second,
by fock 3y ago
Citing yourself
> First, they are only concerned about thermal changes and it is well know now that RF-EMFs have non-thermal effects on biology(1).
> Second, the SAR levels were set using non-pulsed EMFs, and that makes a difference in the biology of RF-EMFs effects(2).
Ah, the science is nowhere settled. I would recommend you start using the appropriate verbs in the future instead of making factual statements!
- FollowingTheDao 3y agoThose bits of the science are settled.
- fock 3y agothat is a lie, when these mechanisms defy both quantum mechanics and anything we know about chemistry.