4 ms·
Surely you have options though? In Rural NZ we have a choice between 4g which runs at about 50mbps and latency of about 15ms and starlink which runs at around 1
by disordinary 3y ago
Surely you have options though? In Rural NZ we have a choice between 4g which runs at about 50mbps and latency of about 15ms and starlink which runs at around 100mbps and has a latency of about 25ms.
Both should be good enough for remote work.
- not_alexb 3y agoI like how you're implying I haven't worked here for years and don't know the options. I have the best possible option and that system can be flaky for hours on end depending on a lot of factors.
- disordinary 3y agoI wasn't implying that at all, more I was shocked at how a country like America doesn't have high speed broadband ubiquitously available. So it was more rhetorical than anything.
- not_alexb 3y agoFair enough. You have my apologies
- lantry 3y agoCalifornia by itself is bigger (by population and surface area) than all of NZ, to say nothing of the rest of the US. I'm not saying that the US has done a great job with internet access, just that it's not exactly a fair comparison.
- dragonwriter 3y agoHaving more people in a bigger area increases the aggregate expense, but also provides more people to spread it around (and the US also has a higher per capita GDP.) There may be legitimate differences that make this harder for the US that aren’t simple failures, but you haven’t identified one.