3 ms·
This might be a stupid question but, you know you should never shy away from stupid questions. What actual practical use would this have? To put another way, wh
by ZenPsycho 15y ago
This might be a stupid question but, you know you should never shy away from stupid questions. What actual practical use would this have? To put another way, what purpose does this serve that could not be served by the normal lua interpreter?
- pessimizer 15y agoI'd ask him. Virding's one of the original inventors of erlang, and also an erlang with a lispy syntax called "Lisp-Flavoured Erlang", so I'm sure he has a plan. Or he was bored, and playing around with mutable state on the Erlang VM.
- frooby 15y agoStability - I'm not sure that any of the current lua port drivers are terribly robust. Even if they were, it's easier to reason about the behaviour of Erlang code than native code within the VM.
- gregholmberg 15y agoIs he (Robert Virding) looking for a lightweight, Turing-complete data description language extension? I started using Lua because I needed to gather logs from many different systems and build timelines around the events to identify patterns across all the aggregated data. The logs were large, and the metadata was often very complicated. I looked at several SQL-like solutions, and at Perl extensions on CPAN. After lots of googling, it finally occurred to me that I might need a programming language that had been designed with efficient data description as a high priority. I was surprised that a streamlined "little" language like Lua fit my requirements [0]. I was expecting to have to learn something big, complicated and esoteric. I needed my resulting datasets to be portable between various Unixes, and fairly standalone. Because of the long load times, I didn't want to use a tool that required any more processing steps on input than absolutely necessary. While serialized Lua tables are more verbose than CSV, they do compress well. They are also valid Lua programs. They can include metadata of arbitrary complexity, and even turing-complete snippets to modify expression of the data as it is loaded. Salvatore Sanfilippo (antirez) had many languages to choose from for his "data structure server". The next major release of Redis will have a Lua interpreter. [1] I don't know Erlang well enough to guess -- is a valid Erlang program an appropriate way to store a large amount of polymorphic data? Is Lua perhaps a better way to approach this problem? [0] "Lua as a data description language (Dimitris Papavasiliou)" http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2004-06/msg00028.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2004-06/msg00028.html [1] "Short term Redis plans" http://antirez.com/post/short-term-redis-plans.html http://antirez.com/post/short-term-redis-plans.html
- silentbicycle 15y agoOne of Lua's predecessors, Sol, was a data language strongly influenced by BibTeX (http://www.lua.org/history.html http://www.lua.org/history.html). Lua's table syntax also bears a strong resemblance to JSON. I don't know about embedding it in Erlang, but anecdotally, it works quite well as a data dump format.
- EvanMiller 15y agoThe main benefits of running code in the Erlang VM are: 1. All network I/O is non-blocking, even if you write code in a blocking manner (i.e. no callback programming when writing scalable servers) 2. Erlang's processes are green threads, so you get massive concurrency for free (i.e. no cooperative thread programming when doing large-scale multi-tasking) 3. In an OTP environment, code will be executed as part of a supervision tree, so it will be very difficult to crash the interpreter (i.e. no strict need for error- and exception-handling code) So while this interpreter will probably be quite slow for single-threaded tasks compared to the standard interpreter, there will be benefits if you want to run a lot of Lua code concurrently in a networked environment.