its blindingly obvious that there is no somewhat immediate BIG problems, but who knows? But as a thought experiment, what would realistically happen if irrefut

its blindingly obvious that there is no somewhat immediate BIG problems, but who knows? But as a thought experiment, what would realistically happen if irrefutable evidence came on the table that RF to the levels of what phonetowers, other peoples cellphones within say... 5 meters distance etc, had negative health effects. Would people be able to demand all RF to that level be stopped? could they sue those who do it? (tv stations, phone towers, regular cellphone owners) if those working as regulators saw the reports, and had a chance to suppress or recommend we cease all modern communication, what do we realistically expect them to do? I think its beyond naive to think that anything would be changed before a solution/fix were to exist, and it also seems very naive to think that anyone who presents evidence of substantial negative effects would be allowed to publish anywhere of consequence.