3 ms·
Literally everything I've seen in the first two categories is complete garbage. You are assuming that you are aware of the origin of everything you read. I sup
by vannevar 3y ago
Literally everything I've seen in the first two categories is complete garbage.
You are assuming that you are aware of the origin of everything you read. I suppose that's possible, but unlikely. At this point the use of generative AI is widespread enough that it's likely that you've read material that you were not aware was AI generated, at least in draft form.
- lisasays 3y agoI think it depends a lot on the sources one pulls from, actually. It would be a major scandal indeed if a stalwart source (like the New Yorker, say) were to be caught trolling its readers with generative content. Also very difficult to keep secret for long (if done at scale), the way the literary world works. Assuming that could even happen, given the current SOA (which from the samples I've been seeing, even those touted as "mind-blowing", seems highly doubtful). Meanwhile if one's daily bread is intrinsically spammy sources like BuzzFeed et al - I agree that one will scarcely notice the difference.