3 ms·
I think it gets skewed by the business / data population, which is a bunch of “engineers” wrapping simple Java and Python to massage data fro multiple databases
by fnordpiglet 3y ago
I think it gets skewed by the business / data population, which is a bunch of “engineers” wrapping simple Java and Python to massage data fro multiple databases into some common form for a data lake or whatever. This sub field hires like mad and is filled with relatively niche and mid to low skilled roles - but lots and lots and lots of them, most medium to large companies hire these roles. Higher end engineering is fairly rarified and under represented.
I also looked at the salaries and was baffled - I’ve not worked in companies with those sort of bands since 1995. At most FAANG and big tech orgs that are serious those averages are under entry level and have been for decades. At one bank I worked at new hires were being offered $250k out of college - 15 years ago.
So these numbers represent the iceberg roles - not visible if you’re in high end jobs and companies, likely even startups, but where most engineers are actually working.
- xp84 3y agoI was also struck by the salaries. Whenever I read mass media salary survey stuff the salaries are low like that. I tend to panic for a minute like “oh no, am I way overpaid?” Everyone who works for me makes more than the average “CEO” in that chart.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- scarface_74 3y agoThis gets back to the bubble I mentioned that most of HN is in. FAANG and BigTech hire a small percentage of the 2.5M developers in the US.
- wiseowise 3y agoWhat’s your point, though?
- scarface_74 3y agoThat most developers don’t work at a FAANG and that most developers are just doing line of business CRUD apps. In other words, your perspective is greatly skewed.
- fnordpiglet 3y agoThat that’s why “mapreduce” shows up at the top and everyone here is surprised. We aren’t representative of our own industry.