> Swapping print() and len() to use in the same program? That would trip any human up, it's tailor-made to be difficult for us to process. And, as it again turn

> Swapping print() and len() to use in the same program? That would trip any human up, it's tailor-made to be difficult for us to process. And, as it again turns out, so it is for LLMs, because they really seem to process associations the same way we do (at the gut/intuition/first reaction level). I would simply write the code I intend to write, then execute three replace operations in vim: %s/len/temporary/g, %s/print/len/g, %s/temporary/print/g. It's not tripping me up at all. Maybe I don't think the same way that these models do?