3 ms·

I don't see any solution that involves mexico remaining an independent country. Corruption is so deep they will just find the next thing to make money off. Ille

by jarsin 3y ago

I don't see any solution that involves mexico remaining an independent country. Corruption is so deep they will just find the next thing to make money off. Illegal pharmaceuticals etc. It would never happen but why not annex Mexico? Send in special forces to wipe out the biggest cartels and put the entire country under Marshall law for x amount of years until they are transitioned into US states. The southern border of Mexico is much easier to manage. Would give us full control of gulf etc. US could be more influential on some of those smaller Mexican border countries.

jmartrican 3y ago
Wow I never even thought of that. It sounds hard to do. The issue with this is that the demand from the American drug users will shift the cartels to another country. I just think the market for drugs in the US is so high, that you cannot fight it. You can only allow it and try to control it.
- jarsin 3y ago
  Legalization just makes it easier for the illegal operators to take advantage. After CA made it only a misdemeanor to illegally grow marijuana the cartels setup shop inside the US. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX21ldNfefA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX21ldNfefA
jprd 3y ago
wow. "I don't see any solution that involves UKRAINE remaining an independent country. Corruption is so deep they will just find the next thing to make money off. Illegal pharmaceuticals, etc. It would never happen, but why not annex UKRAINE? Send in special forces to wipe out the biggest bureaucrats and put the entire country under Marshall Law for x amount of years until they are transitioned into RUSSIAN REPUBLICS. The southern border of UKRAINE is much easier to manage. Would give us full control of Black Sea, etc. RUSSIA could be more influential on some of those smaller UKRAINIAN border countries." I mean. This is HN so I'm presuming no /s tag was inferred? You want to invade a sovereign country because the US has an insatiable drug habit? Beyond that, your argument was scarily like you were shitposting while LARP-ing as Putin.

by jarsin 3y ago

jmartrican 3y ago

Wow I never even thought of that. It sounds hard to do. The issue with this is that the demand from the American drug users will shift the cartels to another country. I just think the market for drugs in the US is so high, that you cannot fight it. You can only allow it and try to control it.

jarsin 3y ago
Legalization just makes it easier for the illegal operators to take advantage. After CA made it only a misdemeanor to illegally grow marijuana the cartels setup shop inside the US. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX21ldNfefA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CX21ldNfefA

jprd 3y ago

wow. "I don't see any solution that involves UKRAINE remaining an independent country. Corruption is so deep they will just find the next thing to make money off. Illegal pharmaceuticals, etc. It would never happen, but why not annex UKRAINE? Send in special forces to wipe out the biggest bureaucrats and put the entire country under Marshall Law for x amount of years until they are transitioned into RUSSIAN REPUBLICS. The southern border of UKRAINE is much easier to manage. Would give us full control of Black Sea, etc. RUSSIA could be more influential on some of those smaller UKRAINIAN border countries." I mean. This is HN so I'm presuming no /s tag was inferred? You want to invade a sovereign country because the US has an insatiable drug habit? Beyond that, your argument was scarily like you were shitposting while LARP-ing as Putin.