Without these violations of the constitution, it, rather than the supreme court, would be the highest law in the land ,and the constitution would no longer be t

Without these violations of the constitution, it, rather than the supreme court, would be the highest law in the land ,and the constitution would no longer be toothless. This is not just factually incorrect, it's... Holy cow. Do you know what judicial review is? It's what gives the Constitution teeth! And I'm at least partially repeating myself when I say this! And why do you accuse me of being, your words, in "abject terror"?