3 ms·

On a purely technical level, importing enough food to feed all the people necessary to prevent 3 million deaths feels staggering. Imagine the convoys. Every ti

• rainhacker 3y ago
  Not sure how this comment made it to the top. As its not so much about importing food, but exporting it from a starving country. From another post in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36104069 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36104069 "I think the question is was the resources diverted from same regions to fight the war or policy decisions taken which would accelerate the onset of famine? Quoting from the book: > The "rice denial" policy saw soldiers confiscate and destroy rice deemed surplus; according to one journalist, thousands of tons of rice were thrown into the water in east Bengal.[8] The "boat denial" policy saw 46,000 boats able to carry more than ten passengers confiscated; bicycles, carts and elephants were also taken.[9] One civil servant said the policy "completely broke the economy of the fishing class" in Bengal. he answer seems an resounding yes - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill%27s_Secret_War#:~:text=In%201942%2C%20as%20a%20result,transport%20should%20it%20invade%20Bengal https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill%27s_Secret_War#:~:..."