4 ms·
My gosh no, this toxic - it is not up to people to have contextualise or defend their behaviour given others' sensitivities. It is fundamentally bigoted to ass
by jasmer 3y ago
My gosh no, this toxic - it is not up to people to have contextualise or defend their behaviour given others' sensitivities.
It is fundamentally bigoted to assume racism, and fundamentally up to people to provide at least some evidence or context if they suspect there is.
The commentor is not going on the offensive, rather the defensive, as someone else brought the issue up.
"makes you look (see, optics again) either incredibly naïve or covering for some pretty bad behaviour."
You have arbitrarily (and repulsively) accused a commenter of 'covering for some crime' - typical of the social justice fanaticism that otherwise empathic people have come to loathe - you may want to contemplate why you might say such a thing.
This isn't an issue of race, it's not particularly part of the dialogue, it's an issue of perceived slight and professional victimhood. Not everything is hyper intersectional.
- drxzcl 3y agoThat’s a lot of words you just put in my mouth. I’m not going to bother responding to every point you just hallucinated, but I do want to point out that I don’t think a crime has been committed.
- jasmer 3y agoYou very literally accused someone of 'covering something bad up' because of a random post.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- drxzcl 3y agoThat’s not what I said.
- jasmer 3y ago"makes you look (see, optics again) either incredibly naïve or covering for some pretty bad behaviour." It is point blank what you said, it's plainly ridiculous that you would deny what is right there as though we're misinterpreting it, this is repulsive gaslighting.
- drxzcl 3y agoThe post is about optics. Read again what I wrote.
- fsociety 3y agoNot at all what they said.