> Really poor leadership, it seems there wasn’t even an attempt at mediation, or a vote, or anything. The post claims that THERE WAS a vote, and that vote was

> Really poor leadership, it seems there wasn’t even an attempt at mediation, or a vote, or anything. The post claims that THERE WAS a vote, and that vote was to give the person a keynote talk... that was somehow rejected by the Rust Project... as the blog post asks at the end, how the heck can someone just say to the Rust Leadership, your vote is just void as I don't like the person or the talk?! How is that possible? Is the Leadership vote just accepted if the top dog likes the result, but not to be taken seriously otherwise?? How do people actually accept this kind of bullshit? If you are in the Rust Leadership, do you just accept being just a token like that? With your votes being completely ignored unless it aligns with the real power broker?