4 ms·

> individual freedoms trumps the safety of other's See, you’re using the fallacy, right here. We can still do both.

• sangnoir 3y ago
  > We can still do both. I was hoping you'd explain in more detail, so I wont have to assume what your reasoning. By "do both", were you perhaps referring to measures like masks mandates while allowing people move freely? Unsurprisingly, some people felt mandates violated the sanctity of their individual rights too.
  • dennis_jeeves1 3y ago
    >I was hoping you'd explain in more detail, so I wont have to assume what your reasoning. By "do both", sangnoir, Think really hard and you will be able to come up with something (where 'both' can be done). If you cannot come up with anything then I'd say that even having a discourse with someone who can potentially come up with something is pointless because of the wide chasm.