4 ms·
I think he's a disgrace to artists (if he even is an artist) and a menace to society if he's literally vandalising private property like this. I know the argume
by gcau 3y ago
I think he's a disgrace to artists (if he even is an artist) and a menace to society if he's literally vandalising private property like this. I know the arguments people have against that and I don't care, get a canvas like the rest of us.
- orra 3y agoHe is clearly an artist, even if you disagree with his method. Besides you forget the house owners here were happy: initially they thought it was cool. Then, instead of painting over it, they sold it for a profit.
- deafpolygon 3y ago> they sold it for a profit So they can take that profit to pay for 250k
- orra 3y agoSome of it, yes, but definitely not all of it. Don't pretend they had to pay 250k. It wouldn't have cost more than a couple hundred just to paint over it.