3 ms·
I find the [sic] amusing because those would both be the correct British way to reference the material and the mass. The oddball in that blurb would be interspe
by 0cf8612b2e1e 3y ago
I find the [sic] amusing because those would both be the correct British way to reference the material and the mass. The oddball in that blurb would be interspersing feet.
- h0l0cube 3y agoYeah, I was confused by that too.
- ralferoo 3y agoGiven that the costs are in dollars in the quoted passage, it's clear that this article is aimed at a US audience. So when reporting a written quote with sections that a reader might assume was an error but is actually correct because it's a direct quote, using [sic] is exactly the right thing to do.