3 ms·
The conversation isn't about ChatGPT. It is about a possible future thing. Also, whether it is "alive" is irrelevant to p(doom).
by TheDudeMan 3y ago
The conversation isn't about ChatGPT. It is about a possible future thing. Also, whether it is "alive" is irrelevant to p(doom).
- AbrahamParangi 3y agoI feel like I'm taking crazy pills: > whether it is "alive" is irrelevant to p(doom) This is an assumption! You don't even know if that's true! Consider, is it even remotely justified?
- TheDudeMan 3y agoI suppose that's fair. Should have said being alive is not necessarily a requirement for doom. But all of us are giving our opinions here.
- kfarr 3y agoI tend to agree that debates about gpt being "alive" or "conscious" seem like red herrings: let's look at the emergent behavior and how that affects the world instead of guessing about its internal state.