3 ms·
Well if we're just going to make wild conjectures, mine is about all the more obvious things: young people were promoted while experienced people retired, in ma
by sublinear 3y ago
Well if we're just going to make wild conjectures, mine is about all the more obvious things: young people were promoted while experienced people retired, in many places the overall workforce has been reduced, work from home has hurt social mobility, night life isn't what it used to be, inflation outpaced payroll, etc.
Focusing on an Adderall shortage is not seeing the forest for the trees. The root cause of a disruption is bound to be the cause of several other disruptions too. Correlation does not imply causation and all that jazz.
- freitzkriesler2 3y agoHitting the nail on the forehead. Adderall had nothing to do with it.
- not_a_shill 3y agoIt's not debatable that the adderall shortage negatively impacted productivity. It's a productivity enhancer, any shortage is a loss in productivity. It still would even if society was perfect. The amount it did to productivity as a whole is debatable and I wouldn't even care to debate it--who cares? If it was your job to make an argument in favor of increasing production limits next time this happens you could tailor data showing a bigger impact anyways.