3 ms·
Spoiler alert: it lied. For example, "Smith v. Johnson, 579 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 2023)" aka 579 F.3d 820 is actually American River Transp. Co. v. Ryan, 579 F.3d
by akiselev 3y ago
Spoiler alert: it lied.
For example, "Smith v. Johnson, 579 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 2023)" aka 579 F.3d 820 is actually American River Transp. Co. v. Ryan, 579 F.3d 820 (7th Cir. 2009) [1]
"Baxter v. Pennsylvania Legal Ethics Board, 100 A.3d 1095 (Pa. 2022)" aka 100 A.3d 1095 is actually Julius L. Worthy v. United States, 100 A.3d 1095 (D.C. 2014) [2]
"Rodriguez, 720 F.2d 124 (9th Cir. 2023)" aka 720 F.2d 124 is actually Specialty Equipment Market Ass'n v. Ruckelshaus, 720 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir. 1983) [3]
[1] https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1358353/american-river-transp-co-v-ryan/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1358353/american-river...
[2] https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2741033/julius-l-worthy-v-united-states/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2741033/julius-l-worth...
[3] https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7902070/specialty-equipment-market-assn-v-ruckelshaus/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7902070/specialty-equi...