2 ms·
What? I told mine to double-check and it was absolutely certain they are real court cases
by armchairhacker 3y ago
What? I told mine to double-check and it was absolutely certain they are real court cases
- akiselev 3y agoSpoiler alert: it lied. For example, "Smith v. Johnson, 579 F.3d 820 (4th Cir. 2023)" aka 579 F.3d 820 is actually American River Transp. Co. v. Ryan, 579 F.3d 820 (7th Cir. 2009) [1] "Baxter v. Pennsylvania Legal Ethics Board, 100 A.3d 1095 (Pa. 2022)" aka 100 A.3d 1095 is actually Julius L. Worthy v. United States, 100 A.3d 1095 (D.C. 2014) [2] "Rodriguez, 720 F.2d 124 (9th Cir. 2023)" aka 720 F.2d 124 is actually Specialty Equipment Market Ass'n v. Ruckelshaus, 720 F.2d 124 (D.C. Cir. 1983) [3] [1] https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1358353/american-river-transp-co-v-ryan/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1358353/american-river... [2] https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2741033/julius-l-worthy-v-united-states/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2741033/julius-l-worth... [3] https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7902070/specialty-equipment-market-assn-v-ruckelshaus/ https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/7902070/specialty-equi...
- simonw 3y agoI think you're joking but I can't quite tell!