3 ms·
I have asked ChatGPT to cite sources when I have doubts. I am often times able to confirm these sources. Seems this lawyer just took ChatGPT at its word witho
by tmaly 3y ago
I have asked ChatGPT to cite sources when I have doubts.
I am often times able to confirm these sources.
Seems this lawyer just took ChatGPT at its word without validating the cases.
- londons_explore 3y agoOr maybe validated one or two, and then assumed they must all be correct.
- tmaly 3y agoI often want good data, so I validate everything. ChatGPT tends to only give a limited number of results in the response.
- chaxor 3y agoGPT-4 has made some substantial improvements recently in references. A few weeks ago using it would get things sort-of correct (the authors would be nearly the same, with one or two just added in or removed, maybe journal number a bit off, etc) and sometimes hallucinate more wholesale, or at least enough that searching couldn't find it as easily. Now, it gets things pretty much perfectly correct everytime as far as I can tell. It gives links that work, and exactly the right reference, every time, even without plugins. However, with plugins now, it doesn't even matter so much any more since it can browse anyway. Very impressive nonetheless.