4 ms·
Annual migration of 700,000 people to a country of 70,000,000 is absurd and completely destabilises society.
by b800h 3y ago
Annual migration of 700,000 people to a country of 70,000,000 is absurd and completely destabilises society.
- another_poster 3y agoI don’t follow—what in particular becomes destabilized?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- krona 3y agoBecause it decreases social trust, the bedrock of a functioning society.
- netsharc 3y agoProbably if one is a nativist, one has in their mind that "migration" means someone coming from a different culture, a culture that is less refined than one's own culture, and so the migrant would make everything in one's homeland worse... Interestingly these numbers are all for legal migration, and the article also says: "It should be noted that we have elevated incoming migration owing to our leading support for Hong Kongers and Ukrainian refugees, as well as very high numbers of students because of our flagship education sector.”. The ONS breakdown is probably better compared to this dog-whistle article: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/internationalmigration/bulletins/longterminternationalmigrationprovisional/yearendingdecember2022 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populati...
- Bran_son 3y ago> someone coming from a different culture, a culture that is less refined than one's own culture, and so the migrant would make everything in one's homeland worse Why should one have to think a different culture and people are inferior, to want to preserve one's own culture and people? If it was environmentalists worried about native wolves being slowly displaced by an invasive breed of dingo, would you call them wolf-supremacists? Certainly nobody accused Kashmir of supremacy when they worried about immigration [1]. Or are human groups so unique, the first of their kind in the entire animal kingdom, that they actually benefit from a competing group moving into their territory? [1] Kashmir’s new status could bring demographic change, drawing comparisons to the West Bank - https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/08/08/kashmirs-new-status-could-bring-demographic-change-drawing-comparisons-west-bank/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/08/08/kashmirs-new...
- netsharc 3y ago[flagged]
- Wherecombinator 3y agoWhy? It’s an increase of 1%
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Bran_son 3y agoAnnual. Which is 80% over 80 years, a single lifetime. Unless there's a plague or the Mongols invade, such shifts rarely happen.
- 29083011397778 3y agoOnly if it's evenly distributed. Canada has a population of ~39 million, but most immigrants are settling in one of two major areas.
- dogma1138 3y agoYoY population increase of 1% is quite difficult to sustain, it puts considerable stress on already stressed markets and social systems.