> Happily surprised you guys managed to get it down to only a 7% failure rate though! Thanks! It, uhh, was quite a bit higher before we did some of that work t

> Happily surprised you guys managed to get it down to only a 7% failure rate though! Thanks! It, uhh, was quite a bit higher before we did some of that work though, heh. Since we can take a query and attempt to run it, we get good errors for anything that's ill-specified, and we can track it. Ideally we'd address everything with better prompt engineering, but it's certainly quicker to just fix stuff up after the fact when we know how to.