4 ms·
Doesn’t matter. He is responsible for what he files.
by mnd999 3y ago
Doesn’t matter. He is responsible for what he files.
- woodruffw 3y agoIt matters in terms of remediation: incompetence implies that lawyers require better technical education on LLMs, while malice implies that the lawyer has violated an already established rule or law. Lawyers undergo continuing legal education throughout their careers; in many (most?) jurisdictions, it’s mandatory. “LLMs are not legal search engines” as a CLE topic in the next decade would not surprise me remotely.
- b112 3y agoUnderstand, some lawyers finished last in class. Cramming for a bar exam != intelligence. Don't let one dumbass, be a example of how all lawyers are.
- woodruffw 3y agoI don’t think I implied that all lawyers are like this?
- b112 3y agoIntended or not, the plural here, when discussing a single lawyer, left me with that impression: "incompetence implies that lawyers require better technical education on LLMs" Others may have a different take?
- woodruffw 3y agoThat should be read as "the presence of incompetence implies that those incompetent lawyers [...]." Sorry if you found the phrasing ambiguous. (The only really important part of the original comment is the part about CLEs: we have an entire professional educational system that ought to be able to accommodate subjects like this.)
- b112 3y agoIt should.
- adriancr 3y agoEither way it's inexcusable, they should be disbarred if they are this incompetent.
- mnd999 3y agoDon’t test in production is the remediation. And if you don’t know that already you need to go back to law school.
- giardini 3y agoYes but be merciful to an unfortunate fool who believed in technology! ChatGPT proved, like the Ouija board, to be the very voice of Satan himself for this lawyer. Bwahahahaaaaaah!8-)