> Junk or not, it doesn't disprove that the remaining majority held key evidence. That’s not how proof works. The burden of proof is on Lindell to prove his c

> Junk or not, it doesn't disprove that the remaining majority held key evidence. That’s not how proof works. The burden of proof is on Lindell to prove his claims true, not Zeidman or the public to disprove some unsubstantiated claims like this.