Direct link to filings: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/mata-v-avianca-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc https:/

Direct link to filings: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/mata-v-avianca-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/mata-v-avianca... This is the filing that appears to be ChatGPT generated: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368.21.0.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.57... There is some back-and-forth over the defendants not being able to find the cited cases in PACER, followed by the April 25 filing which contains entirely ChatGPT-fabricated submissions for each case, such as this one: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368.29.1.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.57... The lawyer admits his use of ChatGPT in a more recent filing: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368.32.1.pdf https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.57...