3 ms·

No, what are you doing? This is what I wrote: > > I still see nothing in what you wrote that indicates they'd be brighter that say 5 to 7 years old kid You th

No, what are you doing? This is what I wrote: > > I still see nothing in what you wrote that indicates they'd be brighter that say 5 to 7 years old kid You then: > sort of prove my point as well. An 8 year old is as intelligent as an adult But I said not more than 5-7. (Could be 3-5 what do I know.) which is not the same as 8. And kids are kids, at 8 your brain is far from finished. (Maybe volume wise 95% but not IQ wise. I found 90% at age 5, volume/weight wise in a quick websearch). IQ wise: Not until a bit past 20 years. (Where are you getting your ideas from?) > Ancient human brains and intelligence are identical to modern human brains and intelligence No. You might have a link to some book that says otherwise, if so I would look at the authors as slightly dumb related to that. > They need their intelligence to cooperate in their hunting Dogs and hyenas do too. I'm unlikely to reply any further. Btw, just one thing: when I was a teenager I had completely wildly crazy ideas about animals and their abilities, ... And, maybe in a way, I know where you're coming from. Have a nice day

bmitc 3y ago
> > Ancient human brains and intelligence are identical to modern human brains and intelligence > No. > You might have a link to some book that says otherwise, if so I would look at the authors as slightly dumb related to that. When I said ancient himans I meant early homo sapiens. I have looked into this before and while the brain has evolved over the time of homo sapiens, it is very much the same core brain. And from what I can tell from my research, the homo sapiens brain has been relatively unchanged since about 100,000 - 200,000 years ago, well before any writing or technological developments. Again, knowledge and technology are not requirements for intelligence. For your kid argument, you would have to argue that the last 5-10% of brain development accounts for the majority of human intelligence. I think that's a tough hill to climb. > I'm unlikely to reply any further. Btw, just one thing: when I was a teenager I had completely wildly crazy ideas about animals and their abilities, ... And, maybe in a way, I know where you're coming from. Have a nice day That's fine, but it's also a rather immature and childish way to have a discussion.

bmitc 3y ago

> > Ancient human brains and intelligence are identical to modern human brains and intelligence > No. > You might have a link to some book that says otherwise, if so I would look at the authors as slightly dumb related to that. When I said ancient himans I meant early homo sapiens. I have looked into this before and while the brain has evolved over the time of homo sapiens, it is very much the same core brain. And from what I can tell from my research, the homo sapiens brain has been relatively unchanged since about 100,000 - 200,000 years ago, well before any writing or technological developments. Again, knowledge and technology are not requirements for intelligence. For your kid argument, you would have to argue that the last 5-10% of brain development accounts for the majority of human intelligence. I think that's a tough hill to climb. > I'm unlikely to reply any further. Btw, just one thing: when I was a teenager I had completely wildly crazy ideas about animals and their abilities, ... And, maybe in a way, I know where you're coming from. Have a nice day That's fine, but it's also a rather immature and childish way to have a discussion.