> You also have the benefit of choosing a classic book out of millions of published books and comparing it against a single ChatGPT response. Most books are not

> You also have the benefit of choosing a classic book out of millions of published books and comparing it against a single ChatGPT response. Most books are not as original as Neuromancer, and our sample of 1 ChatGPT response probably doesn't show the full range of its potential originality. Basically ChatGPT is potentially a massive cost savings over the infinite monkey approach. Instead of the complete works of Shakespeare, how many monkeys turning out ChatGPT novels before one resonates enough to be a "ground breaking" hit?