> The nonce protocol is indeed rather dumb, but that's not a bad thing, sometimes things need to be specified to be as dumb as they can be. No, things should g

> The nonce protocol is indeed rather dumb, but that's not a bad thing, sometimes things need to be specified to be as dumb as they can be. No, things should get as simple as they can be, the nonce mechanism isn't simple it's dumb: instead of just requiring uniqueness of the nonce, to make sure that there's no duplicate transaction, it attempts to be smart in order to “optimize” the nonce verification cost, and to do so it ads the monotonic increase requirement, and this additional* requirement is bad, because if you try to submit multiple transactions concurrently with the same wallet then you're are almost always going to face issues, with transactions being cancelled because they don't have a valid nonce (it was valid when you submitted it, but now it's not and your transaction is cancelled, sorry not sorry).