3 ms·
Technically, you are correct. Some schemes implement read as a simple function which takes a string. "Lisp" isn't referring to any specific lisp and more just t
by jlongster 15y ago
Technically, you are correct. Some schemes implement read as a simple function which takes a string. "Lisp" isn't referring to any specific lisp and more just the idea of it.
- chimeracoder 15y agoHm, guile doesn't seem to like it either Anyway, the original article mentioned Common Lisp, so I assumed that's what you were working with in the examples.