3 ms·
First thing that comes to mind is a lethal dose of neutrino radiation: https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/ https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/ Now the tricky part is probabl
by HansHamster 3y ago
First thing that comes to mind is a lethal dose of neutrino radiation: https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/ https://what-if.xkcd.com/73/
Now the tricky part is probably to build a neutrino / gravitational wave / whatever source that is intense enough to be useful as a weapon without just evaporating everything in a supernova scale explosion before...
- causality0 3y agoOne of the most interesting yet sadly least rigorous What-Ifs. He relies on simply scaling up a calculation in absorbed dose at the distance of one parsec. Neutrinos do not interact with nuclei the same way gamma rays do, and the effects of a particular amount of neutrino radiation on living tissue is unstudied and unknown. The paper he cites explicitly points this out but he ignored it.
- raverbashing 3y agoOf course it doesn't, I think that was given by the relationship between neutrino count and sieverts But make no mistake, there is such a thing as a fatal amount of neutrinos. It's just that's a supernova mind boggling amount, but it exists. They do interact due to the weak force, which is more than neutrons do (and a lethal dose of those is well known)
- mhh__ 3y agoSee also neutrino HFT
- ridgeguy 3y agoIn the sci-fi novel Iron Sunrise by Charles Stross, death by neutrino flux from a weaponized star figures into the plot. (edit - spelling)