4 ms·
If they were a public company then 100% that review should have been removed. That's leaking insider information. Leaking insider information in and of itself i
by bigtunacan 3y ago
If they were a public company then 100% that review should have been removed. That's leaking insider information. Leaking insider information in and of itself is a violation of insider trading laws.
- fatnoah 3y agoThe catch there was that it was our stated goal, but the person leaving that review wouldn't have known about the imminent acquisition, which is what made it all the more ironic.